Use-case screener

Value Stock Screener

A classic value screen — “show me stocks with a P/E under 15” — sounds simple, but run it against the whole market and you'll notice something strange: the results cluster almost entirely in banks, insurers, and energy producers. That's not because those are the best values in the market; it's because those sectors structurally trade at lower multiples than technology or healthcare, for reasons that have nothing to do with any individual stock being mispriced. An absolute P/E cutoff doesn't find cheap stocks — it finds cheap sectors, over and over, while ignoring genuine discounts hiding inside expensive-looking sectors.

The fix is to compare each stock's P/E to its own sector's median, not to a single market-wide number. A software company trading at 25× is cheap if its sector median is 34×, even though 25× would look expensive next to a utility. Tessera Alpha computes a median P/E for each of the 11 GICS sectors every week, then ranks stocks by how far below that sector median they trade. That produces a value screen spread across every corner of the market — industrials, healthcare, consumer names — instead of the same handful of financial and energy tickers every absolute-P/E screener returns.

Sector-relative value isn't the whole story, though. A stock can trade below its sector median for a good reason: deteriorating fundamentals, an accounting red flag, or a business in structural decline. That's why the table below pairs each discount with Tessera's composite quality score — profitability, balance-sheet strength, and consistency, on a 0-100 scale. The goal isn't just cheap; it's cheap and still a fundamentally sound business, which is the combination that separates a real value opportunity from a value trap.

Biggest sector-relative discounts

TickerCompanySectorP/ESector medianDiscountQuality (0–100)
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Technology7.534.6−78%48
KSPIJoint Stock Company Kaspi.kzTechnology7.734.6−78%37
KLACKLA CorporationTechnology7.934.6−77%52
RYAAYRyanair Holdings plcIndustrials6.427.0−76%51
FISVFiserv, Inc.Technology8.334.6−76%42
AERAerCap Holdings N.V.Industrials6.527.0−76%47
HPQHP Inc.Technology8.434.6−76%44
UHSUniversal Health Services, Inc.Healthcare6.225.1−75%45
GMABGenmab A/SHealthcare6.225.1−75%30
CNHICNH Industrial N.V.Industrials6.727.0−75%44
ONCBeOne Medicines AGHealthcare6.225.1−75%53
ELCEntergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MTUtilities5.120.6−75%50
EAIEntergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4.875%66Utilities5.120.6−75%40
EMPEntergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66Utilities5.220.6−75%43
SRJNSpire Inc. 6.375% Junior SubordUtilities5.220.6−75%52
ENJEntergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5.0% Series due December 1, 2052Utilities5.220.6−75%41
ALAir Lease CorporationIndustrials7.027.0−74%56
RYNRayonier Inc.Real Estate7.227.2−74%46
ADAMAdamas Trust, Inc.Real Estate7.327.2−73%59
SONSonoco Products CompanyConsumer Cyclical5.420.0−73%51

Updated weekly · Source: Tessera Alpha factor panel (4,000+ US stocks, licensed fundamental data) · Not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Is this screener free?

Yes — sector-relative value data across the full universe is available on Tessera Alpha's free tier, no credit card required. Backtesting and AI research summaries are part of paid plans.

Why does this table look different from a normal 'low P/E' screen?

Because it ranks stocks by discount to their own sector's median P/E, not by absolute P/E. That spreads results across every sector instead of concentrating them in banks and energy.

Can a stock be sector-relatively cheap and still expensive on an absolute basis?

Yes — a 30× P/E in a sector with a 45× median counts as a steep discount here, even though 30× is well above the broad-market average. That's intentional: it compares the stock to its actual competitive peer group.